ABSTRACT
The
study investigated the relative effect of constructivist based teaching
strategy on academic performance of junior secondary school students in
integrated science. Four (4) Junior Secondary Schools were randomly selected
for the study. In all a total of 120 junior secondary school students
participated in this study. The instruments used for data collection are
instructional package with the use of constructivist based teaching strategy
and traditional instructional strategy and Integrated science achievement test
(ISAT).The data obtained for the study were analyzed using SPSS 14.00 package
and T-test statistics to test the four (4) research questions as well as the
four (4) hypotheses generated for this study at 0.05 level of significant. The
findings revealed that:there is a significant difference in achievement test
scores between students instructed with constructivist-based teaching strategy
and those taught using traditional classroom teaching method.Based on the
findings some recommendations are hereby made for effective teaching and
learning of integrated science: Government should continuously organize
seminars and workshop for science teachers for the promotion and the
application of constructivist approach to classroom instructional process in
secondary schools, Science curriculum must stress educational choices based on
our values and purposes and provide the materials that can help advance the
agenda of scientifically based child-centered pedagogy.
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the Study
1.2
Statement of the Problem
1.3
Purpose of the Study
1.4
Research Questions
1.5
Research Hypotheses
1.6
Scope of the Study
1.7
Significance of the Study
1.8
Operational definition of
Terms
CHAPTER
TWO
LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.0 Literature
Review
2.1 Theoretical Framework
2.2 Basis of Constructivist Teaching
2.3 Epistemological base of Constructivist
Teaching
2.4 Psychological base of Constructivist
Teaching
2.5 Theoretical Assumption of Constructivist
Teaching
2.6 Principles and Strategies of Constructivist
Teaching
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM
Critics
of public education have argued that many Nigerian students do not possess the
depth of knowledge or skills to assure either personal life success or national
economic competitiveness (Akpan, 1996). A particular concern of the critics has
been the apparent inability of many students to engage in complex
problem-solving activities and to apply school knowledge and skills to
real-life problems in workplace settings (Akpan, 1996). What teachers and
schools face is a fundamental redefinition of what it means to be a student or
a teacher and what it means to learn or to teach. Educators are confronted with
a paradigm shift in teaching and learning which is driven by the increasing
anomalies of the current educational system (Kim, 2002). High drop-out rates,
low skill and knowledge levels among many students, low levels of student
engagement in school work and poor international comparisons suggest that the
current educational paradigm is weak or inappropriate.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Knowledge
is not attained but constructed (von Glasersfeld, 1999). This statement came
from a new challenge to the concept of traditional knowledge. Today, we are
facing the challenge from an educational paradigm shift in secondary schools
education in Nigeria. Parents and the general public have criticized the
secondary schools and classroom environments, arguing that they are not ready
to meet learner's needs/ achievement and the demands of the industrial society
in this 21st century information society. Some complain about current
educational practices, raising questions about the inability of Nigerian science
students to perform creative thinking as well as problem solving tasks when
compared to other advanced countries.
Download the complete project HERE
But there is surprisingly very little research effort, particularly in Nigeria that emphasized constructivist-based teaching strategy in science and even less that focused on Basic science at the junior secondary school level. Furthermore no studies to our knowledge had investigated the effect of constructivist-based teaching strategy and its interaction with sex and ability on science and technology achievement and attitude among junior secondary school students in Nigeria. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to specifically determine, among others, the effects of constructivist-based teaching strategy on academic performance of students in Integrated Science.
But there is surprisingly very little research effort, particularly in Nigeria that emphasized constructivist-based teaching strategy in science and even less that focused on Basic science at the junior secondary school level. Furthermore no studies to our knowledge had investigated the effect of constructivist-based teaching strategy and its interaction with sex and ability on science and technology achievement and attitude among junior secondary school students in Nigeria. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to specifically determine, among others, the effects of constructivist-based teaching strategy on academic performance of students in Integrated Science.
1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purpose of this study is to
determine, the effects of constructivist-based teaching strategy on academic
performance of junior secondary school students' in Basic Science inEpe Local Government Area of Lagos State.
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This
study will be guided with four the following research questions.
1. Is
there any significant difference in achievement test scores between students
instructed using constructivist-based teaching strategy and those instructed
using the traditional classroom teaching method?
2. Is
there any significant difference in achievement test scores between male and
female students instructed with constructivist-based teaching strategy?
3. Is
there any significant difference in achievement test scores between high
ability students taught with constructivist-based teaching strategy and those
taught with traditional classroom teaching method?
4. Is
there any significant difference in achievement test scores between low ability
students taught with constructivist-based teaching strategy and those taught
with traditional classroom teaching method?
1.5 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES
From
the research questions raised, four hypotheses will be tested at 0.05 level of
significance.
Ho1: There
is no significant difference in achievement test scores between students
instructed with constructivist-based teaching strategy and those taught using
Conventional classroom teaching method.
Ho2: There
is no significant difference in achievement test scores between male and female
students instructed with
constructivist-based teaching strategy.
Ho4: There is no significant
difference in the achievement test
scores
of students of low ability instructed with constructivist based teaching
strategy and those taught with traditional classroom teaching method.
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The findings of this study will be significant
in the following ways:
It
is expected that the constructivist-based teaching strategy employed in the
study would improve the teaching and learning process thereby enhancing
student’s performance in Basic Science and attitude in Science and Technology.
The
results of this study will be useful to the teacher and student as it would
provide them with alternative method of teaching and learning Science related
topics.
1.7 DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY
This study covers only four Junior
Secondary Schools in Epe Local Government
Area of Lagos State. As a result of the short time frame allocated to
this study. Other challenges encountered in the course of this study includes
·
Financial constraints
·
Uncooperative attitude
of the respondents
1.8 OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS
·
EFFECT: A change which is a result or
consequence of an action or other cause.
·
STRATEGY: method employed by the teacher in
his/her teaching.
·
CONSTRUCTIVIST
TEACHING: Teachers provide an environment in which
students are actively engaged in their own learning, and build their own
knowledge structures by Investigating and discovering (Marlowe & Page,
1998).
·
JUNIOR
SECONDARY SCHOOL: This is the stage of
education following primary education.
·
ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE: This refers to how students deal
with their studies and how they cope with or accomplish different tasks.
·
TEACHING:
This is an intimate contract between a
more mature personality and a less mature one, which is designed for the
further education of the latter.
·
STUDENTS:
A person who is studying at a school or
college. Denoting someone who is
studying in order to enter a particular profession.
No comments:
Post a Comment